<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John McCain Visits the Creationists</title>
	<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/</link>
	<description>Campaign To Defend The Constitution. Because The Religious Right Is Wrong.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: Brock Log (BLog) &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Further signs of McCain&#8217;s madness and pandering of the far Right</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-55359</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-55359</guid>
					<description>[...] &amp;#8220;I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned,&amp;#8221; the Arizona senator told about 800 people in South Carolina, one of the early voting states. Let&amp;#8217;s remember that in 1999 when competing against George W. Bush for the Republican nod for President he said... &amp;#8220;[C]ertainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.&amp;#8221; He&amp;#8217;s embraced the creationism movement and supports the teaching of &amp;#8220;intelligent design&amp;#8221; in schools. And later this month he&amp;#8217;ll be speaking at the Discovery Institute, an activist group seeking to impose the teaching of creationism on all American schoolchildren. McCain now says he supports teaching &amp;#8220;intelligent design&amp;#8221; in our schools, although in 1999 he said it was a matter for local school boards. For more information on the Discovery Institute, see the DefCon blog&amp;#8217;s post here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] &#8220;I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned,&#8221; the Arizona senator told about 800 people in South Carolina, one of the early voting states. Let&#8217;s remember that in 1999 when competing against George W. Bush for the Republican nod for President he said&#8230; &#8220;[C]ertainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.&#8221; He&#8217;s embraced the creationism movement and supports the teaching of &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; in schools. And later this month he&#8217;ll be speaking at the Discovery Institute, an activist group seeking to impose the teaching of creationism on all American schoolchildren. McCain now says he supports teaching &#8220;intelligent design&#8221; in our schools, although in 1999 he said it was a matter for local school boards. For more information on the Discovery Institute, see the DefCon blog&#8217;s post here. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-32018</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-32018</guid>
					<description>Yes, John, you are right.  There are a couple ways you can do it, as you stated.
If your electric company has a program for it you can send the power into the grid, through the inverter, thereby creating a surplus on your bill.  That is best.  This can and should be done with windpower too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Yes, John, you are right.  There are a couple ways you can do it, as you stated.<br />
If your electric company has a program for it you can send the power into the grid, through the inverter, thereby creating a surplus on your bill.  That is best.  This can and should be done with windpower too.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: John McGinn</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31995</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31995</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;The other problem with windmills are those pesky storage batteries. They are much better now, but very expensive.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Yes the batteries dealing with any renewable source is a pure PITA, however with solar they have these buy back plans where you are still on the grid, but during the day when your solar panels are generating more electricity than is needed its being bought back by the power company thus reducing your overall electricity bill.

I'm not sure exactly how this plan works, but does it still require batteries or is the solar power simply pumped through an inverter and sent on its merry way to the electric company?  If we can do this with solar sitting on a house surely we could do it with a wind farm and we don't even have to pass it through an inverter?  Am I right on this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><i>&#8220;The other problem with windmills are those pesky storage batteries. They are much better now, but very expensive.&#8221;</i></p>
	<p>Yes the batteries dealing with any renewable source is a pure PITA, however with solar they have these buy back plans where you are still on the grid, but during the day when your solar panels are generating more electricity than is needed its being bought back by the power company thus reducing your overall electricity bill.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;m not sure exactly how this plan works, but does it still require batteries or is the solar power simply pumped through an inverter and sent on its merry way to the electric company?  If we can do this with solar sitting on a house surely we could do it with a wind farm and we don&#8217;t even have to pass it through an inverter?  Am I right on this?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: Albatross</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31970</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31970</guid>
					<description>Kennedy's constituency is most definitely a factor, Dale, but the Kennedy compund and self-interest is probably balancing the scale in this one. 
Here's a bird's eye, in case you've never seem the compound. http://www.birdseyetourist.com/?p=637 and here's the wikipedia link- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Kennedy&#8217;s constituency is most definitely a factor, Dale, but the Kennedy compund and self-interest is probably balancing the scale in this one.<br />
Here&#8217;s a bird&#8217;s eye, in case you&#8217;ve never seem the compound. <a href='http://www.birdseyetourist.com/?p=637' rel='nofollow'>http://www.birdseyetourist.com/?p=637</a> and here&#8217;s the wikipedia link- <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page' rel='nofollow'>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31922</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31922</guid>
					<description>The other problem with windmills are those pesky storage batteries.  They are much better now, but very expensive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>The other problem with windmills are those pesky storage batteries.  They are much better now, but very expensive.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31919</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31919</guid>
					<description>Perhaps Ted is merely representing the requests of his constituency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Perhaps Ted is merely representing the requests of his constituency.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: Albatross</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31437</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31437</guid>
					<description>Dale, thanks for that great link. I need to look at it in more depth, but it wasn't so totally over my head that I won't get a better picture. I appreciate that.
John, your point about the eye-sore is what I believe to be Sen. Kennedy's true and underlying complaint for the Cape region of MA. While he certainly is not the only family that would take issue with the attractiveness of it all, it still seems somewhat selfish for a bunch of elite snobs to put alternative energy supply behind their summer vacations. Priorities. From what I understand from my Dad, Kennedy is a huge factor in slowing the exploration of this idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dale, thanks for that great link. I need to look at it in more depth, but it wasn&#8217;t so totally over my head that I won&#8217;t get a better picture. I appreciate that.<br />
John, your point about the eye-sore is what I believe to be Sen. Kennedy&#8217;s true and underlying complaint for the Cape region of MA. While he certainly is not the only family that would take issue with the attractiveness of it all, it still seems somewhat selfish for a bunch of elite snobs to put alternative energy supply behind their summer vacations. Priorities. From what I understand from my Dad, Kennedy is a huge factor in slowing the exploration of this idea.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31425</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:30:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31425</guid>
					<description>One neat fact about wind speed is that &quot;the power available from wind increases with the cube of the wind speed. This means that there is much more kinetic energy in windier areas and that a small increase in wind speed can mean a dramatically more attractive location for wind power development. For example, a 25% increase in wind speed (for instance, from an average of 12 to 15 mph) corresponds to about twice the wind power&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>One neat fact about wind speed is that &#8220;the power available from wind increases with the cube of the wind speed. This means that there is much more kinetic energy in windier areas and that a small increase in wind speed can mean a dramatically more attractive location for wind power development. For example, a 25% increase in wind speed (for instance, from an average of 12 to 15 mph) corresponds to about twice the wind power&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31424</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31424</guid>
					<description>Al;ba,
Funny you should ask:

Monday, February 26, 2007 
By Corina Rivera for SNL Energy Power Daily Northeast, February 21, 2007 

Cape Wind Associates LLC filed its final environmental impact report for the proposed 130-turbine offshore wind energy project on Feb. 15 with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act Office. 

The developer said the filing responds to questions about its draft environmental impact report. 

“We hope this filing brings the public benefits of cleaner air, greater energy independence and new jobs closer to becoming a reality for the citizens of Massachusetts,” Cape Wind President Jim Gordon said in a statement Feb. 20.

Also Alba, if you check out the link below, it explains the meteorological issues in your area and the eastern seaboard.  Much of the east the wind gets deflected by the Appalachians and does not recover well over the Piedmont, but is still viable in some areas, including yours., but I have only studied my area and a couple western states.

http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/ne_building_resource.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Al;ba,<br />
Funny you should ask:</p>
	<p>Monday, February 26, 2007<br />
By Corina Rivera for SNL Energy Power Daily Northeast, February 21, 2007 </p>
	<p>Cape Wind Associates LLC filed its final environmental impact report for the proposed 130-turbine offshore wind energy project on Feb. 15 with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act Office. </p>
	<p>The developer said the filing responds to questions about its draft environmental impact report. </p>
	<p>“We hope this filing brings the public benefits of cleaner air, greater energy independence and new jobs closer to becoming a reality for the citizens of Massachusetts,” Cape Wind President Jim Gordon said in a statement Feb. 20.</p>
	<p>Also Alba, if you check out the link below, it explains the meteorological issues in your area and the eastern seaboard.  Much of the east the wind gets deflected by the Appalachians and does not recover well over the Piedmont, but is still viable in some areas, including yours., but I have only studied my area and a couple western states.</p>
	<p><a href='http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/ne_building_resource.asp' rel='nofollow'>http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/ne_building_resource.asp</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: John McGinn</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31423</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31423</guid>
					<description>Wind energy is a viable option in some locales but has its drawbacks, namely huge windmills that not only create a noise and eye sore, but also can do some havoc on some birds as well.  IMO, solar and geo-thermal are preferrable over wind and water just because those 2 have other impacts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Wind energy is a viable option in some locales but has its drawbacks, namely huge windmills that not only create a noise and eye sore, but also can do some havoc on some birds as well.  IMO, solar and geo-thermal are preferrable over wind and water just because those 2 have other impacts.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: Albatross</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31421</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 19:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31421</guid>
					<description>Thanks guys for all the info. My son has a corn and wheat allergy, so things like that make me concerned. We have to be careful with a lot of things that have corn deriviatives. Of course the side effects for him are not deadly, just extremely uncomfortable...and no one else can get in the bathroom when he indulges himself with nachos and salsa!

Dale, John, what about wind energy off the Massachusetts coast? They have been trying to get something passed on this for years, but as Mr. Kennedy and clan have a lovely compound on Hyannisport, they feel it woud be unsightly, and intefere with their pleasures. (Kennedy's logic could be different. I am merely paraphrasing my Dad's ideas on the whole thing with Kennedy's objections. My Dad loves to hate the Kennedys, especially Ted.) One of my friends seems to think the entire Eastern seaboard could generate enough wind power to nearly eliminate oil dependency in this region, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks guys for all the info. My son has a corn and wheat allergy, so things like that make me concerned. We have to be careful with a lot of things that have corn deriviatives. Of course the side effects for him are not deadly, just extremely uncomfortable&#8230;and no one else can get in the bathroom when he indulges himself with nachos and salsa!</p>
	<p>Dale, John, what about wind energy off the Massachusetts coast? They have been trying to get something passed on this for years, but as Mr. Kennedy and clan have a lovely compound on Hyannisport, they feel it woud be unsightly, and intefere with their pleasures. (Kennedy&#8217;s logic could be different. I am merely paraphrasing my Dad&#8217;s ideas on the whole thing with Kennedy&#8217;s objections. My Dad loves to hate the Kennedys, especially Ted.) One of my friends seems to think the entire Eastern seaboard could generate enough wind power to nearly eliminate oil dependency in this region, anyway.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31412</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 17:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31412</guid>
					<description>Nice assessment, John.  Well written and I do concur, and although I despise &quot;stop gap&quot; measures, they are probably a necessary evil.
Have you heard of any new developments in extracting H2 from sea water?

Alba,
Ethanol is the same alchohol that is found in every alchohlic drink, wether it be wine, beer, or whiskey, and as you noted it is made from corn or grain and/ or sugars and starches..  I like to injest it in the form of vodka or bourbon.  You can buy ethanol in almost every grocery store and all drug stores, but it will say (Denatured) on it.  That means they put stuff in it that will make you sick as a dog if you injest it. 

Methanol is &quot;wood grain&quot; alchohol and is poisonous and will make you blind if you injest it, if it doesn't ouright kill you.
Both can be used as motor fuels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice assessment, John.  Well written and I do concur, and although I despise &#8220;stop gap&#8221; measures, they are probably a necessary evil.<br />
Have you heard of any new developments in extracting H2 from sea water?</p>
	<p>Alba,<br />
Ethanol is the same alchohol that is found in every alchohlic drink, wether it be wine, beer, or whiskey, and as you noted it is made from corn or grain and/ or sugars and starches..  I like to injest it in the form of vodka or bourbon.  You can buy ethanol in almost every grocery store and all drug stores, but it will say (Denatured) on it.  That means they put stuff in it that will make you sick as a dog if you injest it. </p>
	<p>Methanol is &#8220;wood grain&#8221; alchohol and is poisonous and will make you blind if you injest it, if it doesn&#8217;t ouright kill you.<br />
Both can be used as motor fuels.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: John McGinn</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31405</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31405</guid>
					<description>I agree with dale's assesssment with regards to bio-fuels.  However I will add that these could become temporary stop gap measures while we consolidate and advance our other technologies.  We need to immediately cut our carbon gas emissions drastically and we need to as soon as possible get out of the Middle East.  Bio-fuels combined with other technologies can help push us in this direction, but will require different perspectives on how we live and eat.  Expect beef, poultry, and pork prices to raise and expect to eat less of them.

With the following we could cut our oil consumption by 40% or more almost immediately:
1.  Energy efficiency, this can cut our consumption by 30% plus.  More fuel efficient vehicles combined with more energy efficient homes and businesses.  Flourescents are now mainstream and LEDs are coming along so lighting is good to go.  New insulation and passive solar designs help reduce both cooling and heating usage.  The real trick here will be retrofitting existing structures.  Passive solar can be used to subsidize water heating as well.

Vehicles will have to be mandated, the industry and the consumers just won't do it on their own.  As much as I am for personal freedom the freedom for some idiot to drive a hummer on his daily commute is now impacting all of our core liberties of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.  If you don't have a true need you will be driving a 2-3 cylinder hybrid that will get 40-50+ mpg.

2.  Supplement current fuel consumption with bio-fuels, nuclear, etc.  These are short term stop gap measures until other alternatives come along to replace them completely.  As dale stated full scale bio fuels is impossible.  Cut oil consumption with these by 5%  We already are on our way to producing nearly 10 billion barrels of ethanol, this would actually be over the 5% of our 150 billion barrels of gas per year consumption.

3.  Active renewable sources where applicable including solar, wind, geo-thermal, and water.  Cut oil consumption by 5-10%.

Alba, don't worry about people allergic to corn, ethanol is not corn but an alcholol derived from corn (or any other sugar or via chemcial means) and when burned turns into water and CO2 just like anything else that is burned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I agree with dale&#8217;s assesssment with regards to bio-fuels.  However I will add that these could become temporary stop gap measures while we consolidate and advance our other technologies.  We need to immediately cut our carbon gas emissions drastically and we need to as soon as possible get out of the Middle East.  Bio-fuels combined with other technologies can help push us in this direction, but will require different perspectives on how we live and eat.  Expect beef, poultry, and pork prices to raise and expect to eat less of them.</p>
	<p>With the following we could cut our oil consumption by 40% or more almost immediately:<br />
1.  Energy efficiency, this can cut our consumption by 30% plus.  More fuel efficient vehicles combined with more energy efficient homes and businesses.  Flourescents are now mainstream and LEDs are coming along so lighting is good to go.  New insulation and passive solar designs help reduce both cooling and heating usage.  The real trick here will be retrofitting existing structures.  Passive solar can be used to subsidize water heating as well.</p>
	<p>Vehicles will have to be mandated, the industry and the consumers just won&#8217;t do it on their own.  As much as I am for personal freedom the freedom for some idiot to drive a hummer on his daily commute is now impacting all of our core liberties of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.  If you don&#8217;t have a true need you will be driving a 2-3 cylinder hybrid that will get 40-50+ mpg.</p>
	<p>2.  Supplement current fuel consumption with bio-fuels, nuclear, etc.  These are short term stop gap measures until other alternatives come along to replace them completely.  As dale stated full scale bio fuels is impossible.  Cut oil consumption with these by 5%  We already are on our way to producing nearly 10 billion barrels of ethanol, this would actually be over the 5% of our 150 billion barrels of gas per year consumption.</p>
	<p>3.  Active renewable sources where applicable including solar, wind, geo-thermal, and water.  Cut oil consumption by 5-10%.</p>
	<p>Alba, don&#8217;t worry about people allergic to corn, ethanol is not corn but an alcholol derived from corn (or any other sugar or via chemcial means) and when burned turns into water and CO2 just like anything else that is burned.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31340</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31340</guid>
					<description>oops. hit the wrong button....I had an anemometer hooked up to a chart for three years and carefully measured the average wind speed, etc.
Also, there is not enough sunny days here in the winter to make solar a viable option.
I use some geothermal but the groundwater is alwas fifty gegrees so it only helps down to freezing.

Now, you hit my hot button about the corn and ethanol.  I don't believe in burning ethanol, I'd rather drink it...er..I mean actually, bio diesel and ethanol are government boongoggles and they are totally loosers.  You hear about them all the time now and everybody thinks we could make some gains by developing them, and some states are getting government money and subsidies to do just that, but, not so fast.  If we were to grow enough biomass (corn, soy, etc, etc) to replace our foreign oil supply, there is not enough arable land in the United States to grow that much. 

Even if we tried to grow 20 percent of the biomass, it would take up valuable farmland and the price of all food would go up, a lot.  We would also have to start farming areas where it would screw up the ecology and do long term harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>oops. hit the wrong button&#8230;.I had an anemometer hooked up to a chart for three years and carefully measured the average wind speed, etc.<br />
Also, there is not enough sunny days here in the winter to make solar a viable option.<br />
I use some geothermal but the groundwater is alwas fifty gegrees so it only helps down to freezing.</p>
	<p>Now, you hit my hot button about the corn and ethanol.  I don&#8217;t believe in burning ethanol, I&#8217;d rather drink it&#8230;er..I mean actually, bio diesel and ethanol are government boongoggles and they are totally loosers.  You hear about them all the time now and everybody thinks we could make some gains by developing them, and some states are getting government money and subsidies to do just that, but, not so fast.  If we were to grow enough biomass (corn, soy, etc, etc) to replace our foreign oil supply, there is not enough arable land in the United States to grow that much. </p>
	<p>Even if we tried to grow 20 percent of the biomass, it would take up valuable farmland and the price of all food would go up, a lot.  We would also have to start farming areas where it would screw up the ecology and do long term harm.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on John McCain Visits the Creationists by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31338</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 13:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2007/02/john-mccain-visits-the-creationists/#comment-31338</guid>
					<description>Alba,
Every different region of the world has diierent meteorological characteristics.
Where I live on the forty second paralell in PA, even though My house is on top of one of the highest hills, there is not enough wind to make a payback on a windmill.  I had an annemometer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Alba,<br />
Every different region of the world has diierent meteorological characteristics.<br />
Where I live on the forty second paralell in PA, even though My house is on top of one of the highest hills, there is not enough wind to make a payback on a windmill.  I had an annemometer
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
