DefCon: Campaign to Defend The Constitution. Because The Religious Right Is Wrong
During our stem cell campaign, DefCon America ran two full page ads in the New York Times in May and June. Click here to see the ad from May. Click here to see the ad from June.

We also released our first video on YouTube featuring DefCon advisory board member and former NARAL head Kate Michelman's incredible story and by doing all we could to empower the millions of Americans for whom we are fighting. Click here to view the video.

To be sure, the fight for health and hope is not over. In the coming months, this fight will move to the states, where citizens are tired of waiting for a misguided President to do the right thing and have taken the issue into their own hands. Stay tuned to the DefCon Blog for updates.

DefCon Blog

John McCain Visits the Creationists

Tomorrow, John McCain will deliver the keynote address at a luncheon co-hosted by the Discovery Institute. For those who are unaware the Discovery Institute is the Seattle based “think tank” that is responsible for spearheading the religious right’s war on science education.

The Institute is responsible for, among other things, the creationist lesson plan that was proposed in Kansas, the anti-evolution language in the Santorum Amendment to the No Child Left Behind act, and the infamous Wedge Document.

None of our elected officials should lend credence to this organization, especially a ranking member of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

Click here to urge McCain to cancel his appearance.

94 Responses to “John McCain Visits the Creationists”

  1. February 22nd, 2007 at 2:46 pm
    Albatross Says:

    McCain is a floundering fish. His oxygen supply is diminishing quickly, and soon he’ll smell really bad.

  2. February 22nd, 2007 at 2:47 pm
    Tony Says:

    McCain is a political whore, plain and simple, who so desperately wants to be the next president. And they called Kerry a flip-flopper; just wait to see what happens if John McCain wins the Republican nomination.

  3. February 22nd, 2007 at 3:02 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Petition signed.

  4. February 22nd, 2007 at 3:12 pm
    dale Says:

    McCain has been out of touch with reality for a couple years now.
    Having said that, my hat is off to him for his great service to the country and the huge sacrifice he made for us all while in the Navy and as a POW.
    It’s over, John. You’ve done your share. You have become irrevelent.

  5. February 22nd, 2007 at 3:48 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Yes, I forgot to pay tribute to his past service. Thanks, Dale.

  6. February 22nd, 2007 at 4:03 pm
    Michael Says:

    Both McCain and Romney have proven themselves to be nothing more than political whores. They’ll say and do anything for a vote from the rightwing fascists. One has to wonder why!!

  7. February 22nd, 2007 at 4:05 pm
    dale Says:

    irrelevent.

  8. February 22nd, 2007 at 4:08 pm
    dale Says:

    Romney declared that the office of president should be held by a person of faith. I couldn’t believe my eyes when I read that. He is not even considered a christian by the fundies.

  9. February 22nd, 2007 at 4:12 pm
    John McGinn Says:

    obviously he didn’t mean a person of faith in the Constitution which states where will be no religious test for any elected official. Its right there in the freaking constitution, what is wrong with these people? Honestly? I want to know?

  10. February 22nd, 2007 at 4:18 pm
    Albatross Says:

    There’s something in the water.

  11. February 22nd, 2007 at 4:26 pm
    Tony Says:

    It is really sad watching both McCain and Romney dropping down on bended knee to kiss the collective ring of Dobson, Robertson, et. al. in transparent attempts to “make nice” with the far-religious right base of the Republican Party. This is because religious far-right activists have so infected the Republican Party, and it is these activists that McCain and Romney have to bow to in order to secure their party’s presidential nomination.

    So far, it appears that the only Republican who is unwilling to “come to Jesus” and change his position on the social issues championed by the religious right is Rudy Giuliani (I had to look that one up!), who is very progressive on many social issues. Which means that even though he would probably be a very strong candidate in the general election and give the GOP the best chance to win, he will never win the nomination because the Jesus freaks absolutely hate his positions on these same social issues.

  12. February 22nd, 2007 at 4:29 pm
    Scott Says:

    I did NOT sign the petition … not because I disagree with the opinion, but because I disagree with the strategy. I do not want John McCain to make yet another decision based upon polling popularity, to feel “pressured” to withdraw. I want him to go to that luncheon and stand there and tell his audience what a bunch of irrational bullies they are, and to tell them that while they have the right to believe any darn fairy tale that they want, they do not have the right to impose that fairy tale on everyone else. Unfortunately, the site did not provide me with an opportunity to send my own message.

  13. February 22nd, 2007 at 4:31 pm
    dale Says:

    I didn’t have the quote quite right:

    “People in this country want a person of faith to lead them as their…president,” Romney said on Fox News Sunday last year. But he bristles when his particular faith attracts attention, as it did in 1994, when he tried to unseat Massachusetts Sen. Edward Kennedy.

    Read about it here, good article:
    http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=7245768

  14. February 22nd, 2007 at 5:02 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Scott, that is good thinking. Unfortunately, that is not what will happen. Desperation leads people to go against their own thoughts. Lately, when I watch McCain, I find that he is contradicting himself from sentence to sentence. He doesn’t stand a chance, no matter how much sucking up he does. Maybe you should email him directly with your opinion, since you didn’t want to sign this petition.

    I wonder how long ago this conference was actually planned with him being the keynote speaker. I’m shocked DI didn’t cancel him out after Dobson dissed him.

  15. February 22nd, 2007 at 5:15 pm
    Albatross Says:

    “If a Nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be… if we are to guard against ignorance and remain free, it is the responsibility of every American to be informed.” — Thomas Jefferson

    Please be informed that LJR is ignorant :-)

  16. February 22nd, 2007 at 5:20 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Off topic: Does anybody see any coicidence in Great Britain drawing down its’ troops for complete redeployment by year’s end, and Prince Harry’s recent call to duty?

  17. February 22nd, 2007 at 5:49 pm
    Albatross Says:

    The Almighty Cheney has spoken:

    WASHINGTON (CNN) — Vice President Dick Cheney said Wednesday he “fundamentally” disagreed with John McCain’s recent criticism of former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and suggested the Arizona senator may owe the former secretary of defense an apology.

    “John said some nasty things about me the other day, and then next time he saw me, ran over to me and apologized,” Cheney said. “Maybe he’ll apologize to Rumsfeld.”

    http://www.cnn.com/POLITICS/blogs/politicalticker/2007/02/cheney-mccain-may-apologize-to.html

    The sad part is that McCain was right. Rumsfeld is going to go down as the worst Sec. of Defense…what he left out is that Cheny will go down as the worst VP, and Bush, as the worst Pres.

  18. February 22nd, 2007 at 5:51 pm
    Tony Says:

    Albatross wrote: “Does anybody see any coicidence in Great Britain drawing down its’ troops for complete redeployment by year’s end…”

    Yes, I noticed that. Bush’s military alliance in Iraq is rapidly becoming the “Coalition of the Less Willing.”

    The Bush Administration is trying very hard to downplay this, but make no mistake; this is a big blow. A long time ago I participated in a training exercise with the British; they are good troops to have with you on your side.

  19. February 22nd, 2007 at 6:59 pm
    Tygered Says:

    John McCain has been taken over by the Puppet Masters. I believe Karl Rove is controlling his body now. Let him go down in flames with the rest of them.

  20. February 22nd, 2007 at 7:03 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Tygered Says:

    John McCain has been taken over by the Puppet Masters.

    Isn’t that a prerequisite for seeking the White House - at least in the past 25 years?

  21. February 22nd, 2007 at 8:00 pm
    pm Says:

    I remember when the Bush campaign maligned him in 2000. The fact that he let them get away with it left an impression on me. Not a good one. Since that time I have lost all respect for him, and now to hear him deny things he said in the past, and declare the opposite to be true (his stand on Roe v. Wade, for example), just confirms that he is not to be taken seriously.

  22. February 22nd, 2007 at 8:25 pm
    has_te Says:

    Actually…this petition is stupid.
    John McCain has cozied with …for starters…The Dear Leader, Jerry Falwell, Geo Wallace’s son
    and the ‘tool’ list goes on.

    So we’re helping him?

    And if DefCon is interested in seeing him elected…I’m outta here.

  23. February 22nd, 2007 at 8:56 pm
    Jesusland Event Of The Day » Big Day For McCain Tomorrow Says:

    […] As the folks at DEFCON remind us: The Institute is responsible for, among other things, the creationist lesson plan that was proposed in Kansas, the anti-evolution language in the Santorum Amendment to the No Child Left Behind act, and the infamous Wedge Document. […]

  24. February 22nd, 2007 at 11:47 pm
    Richard Says:

    In NJ we have a Congressman, Scott Garrett, who is also a believer in Intelligent Design. We don’t need any more freaks in Congress or the White House.

  25. February 23rd, 2007 at 12:35 am
    Drake Milton Says:

    Hey McCain— you need to hear this!

    I just heard University of Wisconsin’s Dr. Sean B. Carroll (Professor of Molecular Biology and Genetics and an Investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical) talk about evolution and how the Discovery Institute cheats students out of an education.

    Carroll, author of the recent book “Making of the Fittest,” explains that the US is paying a price for its lack of scientific literacy.

    Listen here

  26. February 23rd, 2007 at 12:36 am
    Drake Milton Says:

    Hey McCain— you need to hear this!

    I just heard University of Wisconsin’s Dr. Sean B. Carroll (Professor of Molecular Biology and Genetics and an Investigator with the Howard Hughes Medical) talk about evolution and how the Discovery Institute cheats students out of an education.

    Carroll, author of the recent book “Making of the Fittest,” explains that the US is paying a price for its lack of scientific literacy.

    Listen at: here

  27. February 23rd, 2007 at 12:59 am
    Dorris Says:

    Oh, just what the True Believers need to boost their credibility - a visit from John “Any Way the Wind Blows” McCain. I know that’d do it for me…at least until he sells out next week to the other guys.

  28. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:04 am
    Dorris Says:

    And, damn it! I had no idea that the Discovery Institute for Idiots was based in Seattle. I thought all us Puget Sound folks were on the same progressive page, with all the theocratic crazies safely contained east of the Cascades. Granted, I’ve got some nutty Xtian relatives, and one or two neocon neighbors, but they tend to lay low out here in Blue Land. Damn it! Screw them, and screw McCain and the horse he’s riding in on, too.

  29. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:34 am
    Albatross Says:

    Jesusland Event of the Day: Love the McCain youtube. It’s like reading Bushisms. Just amazing.

  30. February 23rd, 2007 at 6:44 am
    Don Rettmann Says:

    I forwarded the DefCon email to my email circle, and here’s what I wrote as a preface…

    Here’s an email from Campaign To Defend The Constitution, known for short as DefCon. It appears that Pander Bear John McCain, who has been kissing up to the fundamentalist “christian” Religious Reich, begging for their votes, is going to be the keynote speaker at an event being co-sponsored by the Discovery Institute, a fundie “christian” outfit that has been working across the country to get public schools to teach “Intelligent Design” in science classes.

    The fundies never tire of trying to undermine the teaching of evolution and other sciences. They want to teach kids that Adam and Eve were real, were the first humans on Earth (even though they don’t tell us where Cain’s wife came from), that the Earth is only 6,000 years old, that the Grand Canyon was dug by Noah’s flood 4,500 years ago, that there were dinosaurs on Noah’s Ark, and more nonsense.

    “Intelligent Design” is their “scientific” presentation that goes something like this; “Gee whiz, life forms are so complicated, only God could have made them”.

    Usually, when fundie members of some school board manage to get ID introduced in a school system’s guidelines, a group of parents sees the danger here, and files suit to get the system to drop ID. There was such a case, a prominent one, recently in Dover, PA, and the parents succeeded, and the voters booted out the fundies from the school board on the next election. Another recurring example has been the Kansas state school system, which every couple years gets taken over by fundie “christians” who then implement “Intelligent Design” guidelines. The next election, the fundies get voted out, replaced by people who aren’t idiots, and ID is again removed. This cycle has repeated itself in Kansas several times since 1999.

    Well, John McCain is bowing and scraping to the fundamentalist “christians”, to get their blessings, so they won’t ruin his chances in 2008 like they did in 2000, when they punished him for calling them divisive. He has now reversed his earlier support of both Roe vs Wade and same-sex marriage, in order to pass the fundie muster. And now, he’ll be speaking at this fundie function.

    Please….write the Pander Bear and tell him to quit kissing up to morons.

    Thanks,

    Don

  31. February 23rd, 2007 at 10:18 am
    Albatross Says:

    That was great, Don.

  32. February 23rd, 2007 at 11:06 am
    Let judgement ring Says:

    Tony Says:

    Albatross wrote: “Does anybody see any coicidence in Great Britain drawing down its’ troops for complete redeployment by year’s end…”

    Yes, I noticed that. Bush’s military alliance in Iraq is rapidly becoming the “Coalition of the Less Willing.”

    The Bush Administration is trying very hard to downplay this, but make no mistake; this is a big blow. A long time ago I participated in a training exercise with the British; they are good troops to have with you on your side.

    Tony, maybe you should listen to the press report from Tony Blair?
    Second, do you know how many British soldiers were stationed in Iraq and where they were located.
    Do a little research before you spew out your stupidity!

    I am sure glad I serve with Marines who understand and know their mission!

  33. February 23rd, 2007 at 11:32 am
    dale Says:

    LJR,
    Did you ever wonder why you don’t have any friends? Ever wonder why nobody like to be around you?
    Isn’t it lonely be isolated?

  34. February 23rd, 2007 at 11:34 am
    Albatross Says:

    Ya, hahaha. You just learned to capitalize Marine. I will doubt until the end every statement you’ve made about serving in the military.

    Why don’t you tell us how many troops from Great Britain have been in Iraq, how many are being drawn down, and when they plan to have complete redeployment? Come on, LJR, do a little work. It will stimulate your pea-brain.

  35. February 23rd, 2007 at 12:17 pm
    Let judgement ring Says:

    Dale, ever wonder why your ass is stretched out and can’t hold in it’s shit anymore?

  36. February 23rd, 2007 at 12:35 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Ooooh, LJR. Out of gas, huh? You become so much wittier after all of your arguments have been shown to be nothing more than a fanciful fairy tales created in your own wee, little, brain (or maybe passed down through your family.)

    Curiousity, what in the hell even made you reference APA writing style? Could it have anything to do with the fact that I referenced HTML code?? Did your wittle pea-brain associate the two for some reason? I prefer MLA writing style anyway, and I don’t usually use the format in posting on a blog. However, it is important to document your sources - something you’ve never been able to do. I would guess that you know your sources are bogus and deluded.

  37. February 23rd, 2007 at 12:45 pm
    John McGinn Says:

    LJR where are your scientific references detailing your claims about no homosexuality in animals? Coward, seems like you cut and ran once again. Not able to provide evidence to actually back up your lame ass assertions you move on hoping no one will notice like a little coward slinking away in the night.

    You seemed to have a hobby of spewing stupdity followed by running away like a coward when the evidence hits the fan and your lies are exposed. A little lying wuss who can’t stand up for his own rhetoric and isn’t man enough to admit it when he’s wrong.

  38. February 23rd, 2007 at 12:58 pm
    dale Says:

    ljr said, “Dale, ever wonder why your ass is stretched out and can’t hold in it’s shit anymore? ”

    That is so articulate I almost passed out. What a pitiful, pathetic, pathological, piece of poop.

  39. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:00 pm
    dale Says:

    ljr,

    You can’t give one answer to McGinn’s questions yu worthless piece of shit.

    You never answered my question either. At what age were you when you chose to be straight over being homosexual?

  40. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:03 pm
    John McGinn Says:

    “At what age were you when you chose to be straight over being homosexual?”

    Dale you are making a huge assumption here ;)

  41. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:03 pm
    Tony Says:

    I don’t even know why I am bothering with this, but here it goes.

    The mental midget LJR whines: “Tony, maybe you should listen to the press report from Tony Blair? Second, do you know how many British soldiers were stationed in Iraq and where they were located.”

    This reduction in the number of British troops being reported on almost all of the major U.S. media stations. I also read the news report directly from theBBC where Tony Blair announced that the UK would be reducing its troops.

    Some 1,600 British troops will return from Iraq within the next few months, Prime Minister Tony Blair has told MPs.

    He said the 7,100 serving troops would be cut to 5,500 soon, with hopes that 500 more will leave by late summer.

    Remaining troops will stay into 2008, to give back-up if necessary and secure borders, but the Iraqis would “write the next chapter” in Basra’s history.

    Furthermore, anyone who is even giving cursory attention to the Iraq War knows that the British have been operating in Basra. Of course, the White House tried to put a good face on this announcement by opining that this troop reduction was actually good news and a sign of progress being made in Iraq. Unfortunately the latest available Department of Defense Report measuring the stability and security in Iraq does not agree with this rosy assessment. From the executive summary:

    Political Stability
    Iraq’s Council of Representatives has passed key legislation to initiate the constitutional review process, to facilitate foreign investment, and to outline a process for region formation. Most important for long-term political stability is the success of Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki’s National Reconciliation and Dialogue Project. This project initiated a series of meetings among political, religious, tribal, and sectarian leaders, and could, under the right circumstances, over the long run, serve as a basis for effective legislation for civil society and a national compact resolving the divisive issues in Iraq.

    However, so far, this project has shown little progress. Sectarian violence has steadily increased despite meetings among religious and tribal leaders. The proposed meeting between political leaders has been repeatedly delayed. Concrete actions by the Government of Iraq to implement national reconciliation have not been successful.

    Some Iraqis now express a lack of confidence in the government’s ability to equitably solve fundamental issues.

    Furthermore, if you look at the figures on Page 28 of this report, Basra province is clearly identified as not being ready for transition to Iraqi control. This assessment contradicts what Tony Blair and the Bush Administration is reporting. Yet, the British are still reducing their troop levels.

    This same DoD report was elaborated in a recent LA Times news report that reported the following.

    The Bush administration hastened to present the British decision as an indication that the U.S.-led military operation was succeeding. Vice President Dick Cheney called the reduction “an affirmation of the fact that there are parts of Iraq where things are going pretty well,” and White House Press Secretary Tony Snow said the U.S.-led coalition “remains intact” even though the roster of nations contributing troops, excluding the U.S., has fallen to 25 from 35.

    But the Pentagon, in its most recent quarterly report to Congress, listed Basra as one of five cities outside Baghdad where violence remained “significant,” and said the region was one of only two “not ready for transition” to Iraqi authorities.

    Once a promising beacon, Basra suffers from sectarian violence as well as Shiite militia clashes over oil smuggling. Ferocious street battles have broken out between rival Shiite Muslim groups in provincial capitals such as Samawah, Kut and Diwaniya in the last year.

    Mental midget LJR whined: “Do a little research before you spew out your stupidity! I am sure glad I serve with Marines who understand and know their mission!”

    And I’m sure that they have to use small words for you to understand the mission.

    You don’t know the first thing about doing proper research, and you demonstrate your complete pig-ignorance with every post you make. Based on your continual demonstrated stupidity, the only job that I could see you being qualified for in the Marine Corps would be as a bullet catcher on the rifle range.

  42. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:06 pm
    Albatross Says:

    I agree. When someone is sooooo strongly opposed to something that really bears no relevance on their own life, it makes you wonder. Look at poor Ted. He “battled” these feelings all of his life.

  43. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:07 pm
    dale Says:

    ***LOL*** I know ! These homophobes are often latent homosexuals. Just like Ted Haggard preaching agaibst gays, all the while being one!

  44. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:11 pm
    dale Says:

    Right on, and there is a good chance that ljr is battling his desires also. That very well could be why he is so misguided and ill-tempered all the time.

  45. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:14 pm
    Albatross Says:

    The more vile they are, the more you have to wonder, and LJR has been pretty vile towards homosexuals. Come on, LJR, just turn the doorknob, and the closet door will open. The truth shall set you free!!!

  46. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:24 pm
    Tony Says:

    Well, I see that my response to LJR is still stuck in that never-never land of moderation. :(

  47. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:29 pm
    dale Says:

    I can just imagine ljr right now trying to figure out some really vile lie to tell us to try to change the subject. He’s probably real mad because we nailed him for what he is and the truth hurts.

  48. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:39 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Yes, Dale, we’re all such immoral animals. He proved this, you know, on the other thread. Something to do with APA writing style and HTML code. Go figure?!

  49. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:42 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Tony, break it down so there’s only one link per post, and delete all your despicable swear words :-)

  50. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:43 pm
    Tony Says:

    Damn, my links crapped out. Here is the first one to the BBC news article.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/6380933.stm

  51. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:45 pm
    Tony Says:

    Now, here is the link to the Department of Defense report I cited.

    http://www.defenselink.mil/pubs/pdfs/9010Quarterly-Report-20061216.pdf

    This one takes a bit of time to open up.

  52. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:47 pm
    Tony Says:

    And, finally, here is the LA Times story I linked to.

    http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/front/la-fg-brits22feb22,1,4360133.story?coll=la-headlines-frontpage&ctrack=1&cset=true

    Your right, Alba, next time I will break these posts down a bit. However, I did not curse.

  53. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:50 pm
    bigshow Says:

    I’ve been out of the loop for the past couple of months but it doesn’t look like I missed much same old, same old, you all start talking about John M. or whoever and end up talking about this fascination with the same sex. One Question to all: who or what determines right or wrong? Simple question… simple answer please!

  54. February 23rd, 2007 at 1:58 pm
    John McGinn Says:

    Why does the answer have to be simple? Who says it does?

    I’m all for indivdiual liberty, so as long as your acts don’t harm others I think it is up to the individual to decide what is right or wrong. If my actions harm no one, why should anyone, and I mean anyone have authority over me to say what I’m doing is right or wrong? I’m abhor illegitimate authority and I fear illegitimate authority imposed on others through violence or threat.

  55. February 23rd, 2007 at 2:04 pm
    Tony Says:

    Why does the answer have to be simple? Who says it does?

    That is because some people only understand simple words that are explaned vvvvveryyyyy ssssslowlyyyyy to them.

  56. February 23rd, 2007 at 2:14 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Tony, excellent post on the British withdrawl of troops. LJR’s capacity for comprehension makes this beyond his abilities. I was joking about the swear words, Tony. I’ve come to know your writing style, and considered it very funny the one time I actually saw a swear slip out of you :-)
    Amen, John. I refuse for someone to come into my personal space and tell me what I’m doing is right or wrong, if I am causing no one harm, and violating no laws. I am responsible for my own behavior, and no freaking book is going to dictate to me what I should or should think.

  57. February 23rd, 2007 at 2:15 pm
    Albatross Says:

    above post corrected -
    “should or should NOT think”

  58. February 23rd, 2007 at 2:23 pm
    Albatross Says:

    has_te Says: So we’re helping him? And if DefCon is interested in seeing him elected…I’m outta here.

    I think DefCon is trying to show him how silly he looks with all his flip-flop pandering. He’s absurd. I can’t speak for anyone else, but I wouldn’t vote for McCain if he were the only candidate. He’s daaangerous. Maybe not quite as bad as what we’ve got right now, but so damn close to it that there would be no recognizable difference.

    So, if you’d like to leave, bye bye.

  59. February 23rd, 2007 at 2:35 pm
    dale Says:

    Bigshow,
    I agree with John McGinn, but I am more interested in your answer. Who or what do you think determines right from wrong. Simple or complicated answer is fine with me.

  60. February 24th, 2007 at 12:49 am
    Albatross Says:

    Jones says he has seen the senator’s speech and it “will focus on issues relating to foreign affairs, specifically about the Pacific Rim.”

    The Campaign to Defend the Constitution’s Timi Gerson says the subject of McCain’s speech doesn’t matter, and is not the issue.

    “It’s outrageous for a nationally respected political leader of his stature — who is furthermore a member of the Senate Committee charged with overseeing science — to do anything co-sponsored by a group with an explicit anti-science agenda that is trying to push theology in the classroom,” Gerson said.

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=2897153&page=1

  61. February 24th, 2007 at 12:52 am
    Albatross Says:

    McCain criticized for lunch sponsor
    SEATTLE, Feb. 23 (UPI) — U.S. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., is being criticized for agreeing to speak at an event associated with an organization promoting intelligent design.

    The liberal group Campaign to Defend the Constitution says it is outrageous for a nationally respected political leader to do anything co-sponsored by a group with an explicit anti-science agenda, ABC News reports.

    http://www.upi.com/NewsTrack/Top_News/Divine_Strake_test_explosion_canceled/20070223-101324-3613r/

    Liberal?

  62. February 24th, 2007 at 1:16 am
    Albatross Says:

    Exclusive Update on Darwinian Upset
    Discovery Responds to Darwin Outburst Against McCain Speaking at Luncheon

    The second passage from Buckley, says Crowther, “sums it up nicely”:

    (Crowther is director of media and public relations at Discovery. Buckley is a writer for National Review and wrote an article on Feb 16 titled “So help us Darwin.”)

    “But the intelligent liberal community should not impose on anyone a requirement of believing that there is only the single, materialist word on the subject, and that only contempt is merited by those who consent to appear at think tanks composed of men and women prepared to explore ultimate questions, which certainly include the question, Did God have a hand in creating all of this? Including the great messes we live with?”

    full article The Pearcey Report, and it features comments, etc., by editor and publisher Rick Pearcey, as well as by editor at large Nancy Pearcey, who is also a senior fellow at the Discovery Institute.
    http://www.pearceyreport.com/archives/2007/02/post_76.php

    Someone should send this to the McCain camp. I wonder if he knows he should be prepared to explore the ultimate questions?? Oh wait, he’s just having lunch with a group composed of people who think like this. It doesn’t mean that’s what they’re going to talk about. Whew, for a minute there I was worried that McCain was going in for a brainwashing session on the evils of science and the goodness of God.
    There’s a link to a forum.

  63. February 24th, 2007 at 7:47 am
    Don Rettmann Says:

    bigshow…

    Only asshats like LJR are fascinated by the same-sex thing.

    To everyone else, it’s not a big deal.

    So…what are YOU wearing right now?

  64. February 24th, 2007 at 11:43 am
    Albatross Says:

    LOL!

  65. February 24th, 2007 at 1:12 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Hey, I wonder if in addition to Clark and others just getting to the press, there is a fungus among us? MJ? Are you a fungus?

    Reposted from Fri open thread:
    Albatross Says:

    Shit!!!! I hate moderation. Broken post to escape the hands of the moderators!!

    February 24th, 2007 at 12:47 pm

    Albatross Says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.

    EXTRA! EXTRA!
    Discovery Institute devoted an entire press release to Defcon

    Evolution News & Views
    News Analysis of Media Coverage of the Debate Over Evolution
    « Francis Collins Handles Darwinism’s Universal Acid Like Baby Formula | Main

    Fenton Firm Tries (and Fails) to Sandbag Sen. John McCain and Discovery Institute
    Cross-posted at Discovery Blog.

    Senator John McCain signing autographs after his speech on foreign policy at the Seattle Westin Hotel.

    “Defcon,” the Campaign to Defend the Constitution (such a high sounding name!), put out a press release and blog post this week that attempted to sandbag Sen. John McCain, criticizing him for speaking to a Seattle policy luncheon today where Discovery Institute was one of the “co-presenters”. Defcon scolded McCain for attending an event in which Discovery was involved and for thereby “lending credence (sic) to this organization”. Defcon called on McCain to cancel the speech. At the definitely un-cancelled event today I asked Sen. McCain if he had heard of Defcon. He hadn’t.

    Defcon is a creature of Fenton Communications, the left and far-left operation that backs the likes of Cindy Sheehan, Moveon.org, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), the ACLU, Rainforest Action Network and Global Exchange (the anti-WTO demonstrators). Fenton is also famous for attacking U.S. corporations with bogus environmental and consumerist claims. “To Change an Industry, Target One Company,” is a favorite Fenton motto. Among the fake scandals Fenton has shopped was the Alar scare that unfairly damaged the U.S. apple industry. Fenton recently helped create Defcon, to combat, among other things, us.

    he press contact for Defcon’s broadside against Sen. McCain this week is Timi Gerson, who is a Fenton veteran of Moveon.org. So you begin to get the picture. It is fair to say that we would not be Fenton’s favorite think tank on almost any topic.

    The silliness began with a contradictory attempt to a) suggest that we had finagled a speech by an unsuspecting Sen. McCain to talk about intelligent design; and b) that we really were not involved in the luncheon event, after all, or had misrepresented our role. In fact, the major sponsors were Seattle’s World Affairs Council and City Club. They asked us to join them as a “co-presenter”, as we often do, and we agreed. This is SOP for non-profit groups in this area who want to build a crowd for a nationally prominent speaker. We do the same when we are the main sponsor of an event. (A World Affairs Council leader called after the event to express dismay that one of his staffers had made an “inappropriate” comment to a reporter that Discovery had merely “hopped on” the event.)

    As for why we would be participating in a speech on foreign policy by Sen. McCain, it apparently is unknown to many observers that Discovery holds a number of foreign policy events; most recently ones on Somalia, the dissident groups in Iran and on current difficulties in U.S.-Russian relations. Our involvement in foreign policy issues is even older than our interest in science and culture.

    Anyhow, for better or worse, intelligent design didn’t even come up at the McCain event today, though a reporter may have asked about it afterwards.

    On the margins of the event I did have a chance to discuss Iran with the Senator (and with Iranian-American leader, Shayan Arya, shown below).

    http://www.evolutionnews.org/2007/02/fenton_firm_tries_and_fails_to.html
    And Tom Till of our Cascadia Center on Transportation had a chance to talk with Sen. McCain about two issues we care about: energy conservation and passenger rail reform. Tom is seen below explaining our proposal for Plug-In Hybrid Vehicles (PHEVs). It’s a proposal backed by several in Congress, including Senators Lieberman and Brownback, and Washington Congressmen Jay Inslee and Dave Reichert. Discovery and the Senator share a strong interest in passenger rail reform. Senator McCain showed interest. It’s all that we could ask.

    One final thought about Defcon. Reporters should be wary of the ways Defcon represents us and our positions. We speak for ourselves and our positions are often very different from what Defcon tells the press.

    Posted by Bruce Chapman on February 23, 2007 7:59 PM |

  66. February 24th, 2007 at 3:12 pm
    Albatross Says:

    After the speech, McCain was asked by an audience member if he was “sucking up to the religious right.” He drew laughs by responding: “What’s wrong with sucking up to everybody?”

    http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2900572

  67. February 24th, 2007 at 10:16 pm
    Dorris Says:

    Gee, aren’t McCain’s knees getting pretty dirty by now?

  68. February 25th, 2007 at 6:55 am
    Don Rettmann Says:

    At the event, McCain said the following.

    About Tony Blair, he said “He has literally sacrificed his political career because of Iraq, That is a great testament to his political courage.”

    Gee…what courage. What about the US soldiers who have been killed and maimed because of Bush’s and Cheney’s lies?

    He also said “I believe that if we fail in Iraq, you will see chaos and genocide”.

    Gee again…what the hell does he think is happening there now?

  69. February 25th, 2007 at 10:39 am
    dale Says:

    The Discovery Institute is backing the plug in hybred vehicles.
    They don’t have a clue what they are doing. Electric vehicles that draw electricity from the grid are notoriously inefficient.
    The reason why is that the power plants them selves are inefficient and then when they transmit the power over long distances on the high tension lines there is a thirty percent energy loss.
    This is a lie that has been perpetrated for years in this country. Any electric appliance you buy is listed as one hundred percent efficient, and in the case of a space heater, yes the watts of electricity are converted into one hundred percent heat, but they conveniently forget to factor in the inefficiency of the plant and the energy loss in the transmission lines.

  70. February 26th, 2007 at 6:26 am
    Don Rettmann Says:

    I also love that Discovery Institute has their undies all knotted up over DefCon. It means DefCon is doing the right thing.

  71. February 26th, 2007 at 8:32 am
    dale Says:

    Don,
    Yes, and it was entertaining to see Alba obtain much glee from that fact. They asked McCain if he had heard of Defcon and supposedly he said no. That is a lie. But, anyway, he does know now.

  72. February 26th, 2007 at 9:25 am
    Albatross Says:

    :-) I’m still very gleeful!

  73. February 26th, 2007 at 12:31 pm
    John McGinn Says:

    “They don’t have a clue what they are doing. Electric vehicles that draw electricity from the grid are notoriously inefficient.”
    Exactly and if that electricity doesn’t come from a form other than carbon based we are right back in the same boat as we are now. Anytime you convert one form of energy to another you lose some of it, usually a good chunk of it.

    The only argument one can make for pushing these is that electricity can be generated via other means, some clean and renewable, solar, wind, geothermal, etc., others not so clean, nuclear.

  74. February 26th, 2007 at 12:55 pm
    dale Says:

    Right on, John.
    And the batteries needed to store the electricity from the grid are environmentally unfriendly (heavy metals, acid, et)c) and they need to be charged for eight hour periods. They are expensive and their service life is relatively short.

    Fuel cells, on the other hand, will kick start the hydrogen economy. Fuel Cells are viable energy producers at this time, but the reformer part of the cells has not been perfected and the cost of producing electricity is still slightly more that buying it off the grid. A fuel cell takes a hydrocarbon faction like methane or propane and separates the hydrogen atoms from the carbon atoms that make up the molecule. Then the hydrogen is used in an IC engine that produces a little heat and some pure water only.
    We have a way to go with fuel cells but they hold a lot of promise.
    One of the companies that I have watched in the development of fuel cells is “Plug Power,” and they have some interesting stuff on their site.

    Ultimately, we will need to extract hydrogen from seawater.

  75. February 26th, 2007 at 3:53 pm
    John McGinn Says:

    “and the cost of producing electricity is still slightly more that buying it off the grid.”

    I wonder if one were to factor in all the social non monatary costs in to the equation how would the cost comparison fair?
    1. Reduced green house gas emissions, check
    2. Removal of our ties and political vulnerabilities with the Middle East, check

    Those two alone would count for how many billions of dollars? Maybe trillions.

    I honestly think that hydrogen and other renewable sources such as solar are viable now and just as cost effective if one looks at the real costs that eventually we all end up paying. But it keeps exxon-mobil real happy.

  76. February 26th, 2007 at 3:58 pm
    dale Says:

    “1. Reduced green house gas emissions, check
    2. Removal of our ties and political vulnerabilities with the Middle East, check”

    Absolutely, John.

  77. February 27th, 2007 at 12:08 am
    Albatross Says:

    I don’t know a lot about this, but wouldn’t wind also be a viable source of energy right now, also? Aren’t there countries in Europe that are completely wind and solar power? Maybe we’d even have more to invest in health care if we had some of those trillions out of the ME.
    But I have a question that might sound silly. They have talked about the conversion of corn to ethanol, and here’s where it gets funny. If someone was highly allergic to corn, and all of a sudden it was in the air all around them, wouldn’t that be dangerous?

  78. February 27th, 2007 at 8:03 am
    Don Rettmann Says:

    Albatross, I’ll hazard a guess at this…I think creation of ethanol from corn would not present a danger to anyone allergic to corn. But I’m only guessing.

  79. February 27th, 2007 at 8:05 am
    Don Rettmann Says:

    Anyone remember George Gobel…”Lonesome George”?

    I saw him perform once, and he had a great line. He was playing an electric guitar, and said “When I started out, I used to play a coal guitar”.

  80. February 27th, 2007 at 9:00 am
    dale Says:

    Alba,
    Every different region of the world has diierent meteorological characteristics.
    Where I live on the forty second paralell in PA, even though My house is on top of one of the highest hills, there is not enough wind to make a payback on a windmill. I had an annemometer

  81. February 27th, 2007 at 9:10 am
    dale Says:

    oops. hit the wrong button….I had an anemometer hooked up to a chart for three years and carefully measured the average wind speed, etc.
    Also, there is not enough sunny days here in the winter to make solar a viable option.
    I use some geothermal but the groundwater is alwas fifty gegrees so it only helps down to freezing.

    Now, you hit my hot button about the corn and ethanol. I don’t believe in burning ethanol, I’d rather drink it…er..I mean actually, bio diesel and ethanol are government boongoggles and they are totally loosers. You hear about them all the time now and everybody thinks we could make some gains by developing them, and some states are getting government money and subsidies to do just that, but, not so fast. If we were to grow enough biomass (corn, soy, etc, etc) to replace our foreign oil supply, there is not enough arable land in the United States to grow that much.

    Even if we tried to grow 20 percent of the biomass, it would take up valuable farmland and the price of all food would go up, a lot. We would also have to start farming areas where it would screw up the ecology and do long term harm.

  82. February 27th, 2007 at 12:44 pm
    John McGinn Says:

    I agree with dale’s assesssment with regards to bio-fuels. However I will add that these could become temporary stop gap measures while we consolidate and advance our other technologies. We need to immediately cut our carbon gas emissions drastically and we need to as soon as possible get out of the Middle East. Bio-fuels combined with other technologies can help push us in this direction, but will require different perspectives on how we live and eat. Expect beef, poultry, and pork prices to raise and expect to eat less of them.

    With the following we could cut our oil consumption by 40% or more almost immediately:
    1. Energy efficiency, this can cut our consumption by 30% plus. More fuel efficient vehicles combined with more energy efficient homes and businesses. Flourescents are now mainstream and LEDs are coming along so lighting is good to go. New insulation and passive solar designs help reduce both cooling and heating usage. The real trick here will be retrofitting existing structures. Passive solar can be used to subsidize water heating as well.

    Vehicles will have to be mandated, the industry and the consumers just won’t do it on their own. As much as I am for personal freedom the freedom for some idiot to drive a hummer on his daily commute is now impacting all of our core liberties of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. If you don’t have a true need you will be driving a 2-3 cylinder hybrid that will get 40-50+ mpg.

    2. Supplement current fuel consumption with bio-fuels, nuclear, etc. These are short term stop gap measures until other alternatives come along to replace them completely. As dale stated full scale bio fuels is impossible. Cut oil consumption with these by 5% We already are on our way to producing nearly 10 billion barrels of ethanol, this would actually be over the 5% of our 150 billion barrels of gas per year consumption.

    3. Active renewable sources where applicable including solar, wind, geo-thermal, and water. Cut oil consumption by 5-10%.

    Alba, don’t worry about people allergic to corn, ethanol is not corn but an alcholol derived from corn (or any other sugar or via chemcial means) and when burned turns into water and CO2 just like anything else that is burned.

  83. February 27th, 2007 at 1:41 pm
    dale Says:

    Nice assessment, John. Well written and I do concur, and although I despise “stop gap” measures, they are probably a necessary evil.
    Have you heard of any new developments in extracting H2 from sea water?

    Alba,
    Ethanol is the same alchohol that is found in every alchohlic drink, wether it be wine, beer, or whiskey, and as you noted it is made from corn or grain and/ or sugars and starches.. I like to injest it in the form of vodka or bourbon. You can buy ethanol in almost every grocery store and all drug stores, but it will say (Denatured) on it. That means they put stuff in it that will make you sick as a dog if you injest it.

    Methanol is “wood grain” alchohol and is poisonous and will make you blind if you injest it, if it doesn’t ouright kill you.
    Both can be used as motor fuels.

  84. February 27th, 2007 at 3:07 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Thanks guys for all the info. My son has a corn and wheat allergy, so things like that make me concerned. We have to be careful with a lot of things that have corn deriviatives. Of course the side effects for him are not deadly, just extremely uncomfortable…and no one else can get in the bathroom when he indulges himself with nachos and salsa!

    Dale, John, what about wind energy off the Massachusetts coast? They have been trying to get something passed on this for years, but as Mr. Kennedy and clan have a lovely compound on Hyannisport, they feel it woud be unsightly, and intefere with their pleasures. (Kennedy’s logic could be different. I am merely paraphrasing my Dad’s ideas on the whole thing with Kennedy’s objections. My Dad loves to hate the Kennedys, especially Ted.) One of my friends seems to think the entire Eastern seaboard could generate enough wind power to nearly eliminate oil dependency in this region, anyway.

  85. February 27th, 2007 at 3:57 pm
    John McGinn Says:

    Wind energy is a viable option in some locales but has its drawbacks, namely huge windmills that not only create a noise and eye sore, but also can do some havoc on some birds as well. IMO, solar and geo-thermal are preferrable over wind and water just because those 2 have other impacts.

  86. February 27th, 2007 at 4:23 pm
    dale Says:

    Al;ba,
    Funny you should ask:

    Monday, February 26, 2007
    By Corina Rivera for SNL Energy Power Daily Northeast, February 21, 2007

    Cape Wind Associates LLC filed its final environmental impact report for the proposed 130-turbine offshore wind energy project on Feb. 15 with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act Office.

    The developer said the filing responds to questions about its draft environmental impact report.

    “We hope this filing brings the public benefits of cleaner air, greater energy independence and new jobs closer to becoming a reality for the citizens of Massachusetts,” Cape Wind President Jim Gordon said in a statement Feb. 20.

    Also Alba, if you check out the link below, it explains the meteorological issues in your area and the eastern seaboard. Much of the east the wind gets deflected by the Appalachians and does not recover well over the Piedmont, but is still viable in some areas, including yours., but I have only studied my area and a couple western states.

    http://www.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/windpoweringamerica/ne_building_resource.asp

  87. February 27th, 2007 at 4:30 pm
    dale Says:

    One neat fact about wind speed is that “the power available from wind increases with the cube of the wind speed. This means that there is much more kinetic energy in windier areas and that a small increase in wind speed can mean a dramatically more attractive location for wind power development. For example, a 25% increase in wind speed (for instance, from an average of 12 to 15 mph) corresponds to about twice the wind power”

  88. February 27th, 2007 at 7:54 pm
    Albatross Says:

    Dale, thanks for that great link. I need to look at it in more depth, but it wasn’t so totally over my head that I won’t get a better picture. I appreciate that.
    John, your point about the eye-sore is what I believe to be Sen. Kennedy’s true and underlying complaint for the Cape region of MA. While he certainly is not the only family that would take issue with the attractiveness of it all, it still seems somewhat selfish for a bunch of elite snobs to put alternative energy supply behind their summer vacations. Priorities. From what I understand from my Dad, Kennedy is a huge factor in slowing the exploration of this idea.

  89. February 28th, 2007 at 9:18 am
    dale Says:

    Perhaps Ted is merely representing the requests of his constituency.

  90. February 28th, 2007 at 9:27 am
    dale Says:

    The other problem with windmills are those pesky storage batteries. They are much better now, but very expensive.

  91. February 28th, 2007 at 11:39 am
    Albatross Says:

    Kennedy’s constituency is most definitely a factor, Dale, but the Kennedy compund and self-interest is probably balancing the scale in this one.
    Here’s a bird’s eye, in case you’ve never seem the compound. http://www.birdseyetourist.com/?p=637 and here’s the wikipedia link- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

  92. February 28th, 2007 at 12:38 pm
    John McGinn Says:

    “The other problem with windmills are those pesky storage batteries. They are much better now, but very expensive.”

    Yes the batteries dealing with any renewable source is a pure PITA, however with solar they have these buy back plans where you are still on the grid, but during the day when your solar panels are generating more electricity than is needed its being bought back by the power company thus reducing your overall electricity bill.

    I’m not sure exactly how this plan works, but does it still require batteries or is the solar power simply pumped through an inverter and sent on its merry way to the electric company? If we can do this with solar sitting on a house surely we could do it with a wind farm and we don’t even have to pass it through an inverter? Am I right on this?

  93. February 28th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
    dale Says:

    Yes, John, you are right. There are a couple ways you can do it, as you stated.
    If your electric company has a program for it you can send the power into the grid, through the inverter, thereby creating a surplus on your bill. That is best. This can and should be done with windpower too.

  94. April 20th, 2007 at 3:49 pm
    Brock Log (BLog) » Blog Archive » Further signs of McCain’s madness and pandering of the far Right Says:

    […] “I do not support Roe versus Wade. It should be overturned,” the Arizona senator told about 800 people in South Carolina, one of the early voting states. Let’s remember that in 1999 when competing against George W. Bush for the Republican nod for President he said… “[C]ertainly in the short term, or even the long term, I would not support repeal of Roe v. Wade, which would then force X number of women in America to [undergo] illegal and dangerous operations.” He’s embraced the creationism movement and supports the teaching of “intelligent design” in schools. And later this month he’ll be speaking at the Discovery Institute, an activist group seeking to impose the teaching of creationism on all American schoolchildren. McCain now says he supports teaching “intelligent design” in our schools, although in 1999 he said it was a matter for local school boards. For more information on the Discovery Institute, see the DefCon blog’s post here. […]

The Campaign to Defend the Constitution combats the growing influence of the religious right over American democracy, education, and scientific progress and leadership.