<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly</title>
	<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/</link>
	<description>Campaign To Defend The Constitution. Because The Religious Right Is Wrong.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: DefCon Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Stand For The Family Events Bomb</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-14533</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 13:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-14533</guid>
					<description>[...] You&amp;#8217;ll remember that in August, Focus on the Family announced a massive campaign to influence the elections in eight targeted states. The campaign was touted as the largest political effort by the religious right since the heyday of the Christian Coalition and reportedly combines a massive voter registration effort, the distribution of voter guides, and a series of high profile &amp;#8220;Stand for the Family&amp;#8221; events across the country featuring both Dobson, Family Research Council head Tony Perkins, and Gary Bauer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] You&#8217;ll remember that in August, Focus on the Family announced a massive campaign to influence the elections in eight targeted states. The campaign was touted as the largest political effort by the religious right since the heyday of the Christian Coalition and reportedly combines a massive voter registration effort, the distribution of voter guides, and a series of high profile &#8220;Stand for the Family&#8221; events across the country featuring both Dobson, Family Research Council head Tony Perkins, and Gary Bauer. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-9607</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 17:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-9607</guid>
					<description>Actually, they have to be careful, but a preacher can talk about voting for candidates that oppose gay marriage or abortion, but they can't actually endorse a candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Actually, they have to be careful, but a preacher can talk about voting for candidates that oppose gay marriage or abortion, but they can&#8217;t actually endorse a candidate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: Lynne</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-9570</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 13:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-9570</guid>
					<description>You can't have it both ways...if you want to retain your tax-exempt status, then you need to keep your pulpit free of political rhetoric. I believe a pastor can, as an INDIVIDUAL,  involve him/herself in election activities, BUT, the minute that involvement spills over to the pulpit, all bets are off. When you start spouting political rhetoric from the pulpit, you are violating the agreement by which your church received its tax-exemption. When you violate the agreement, the contract is terminated, and you can start negotiations with the IRS for filing your yearly claim form.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You can&#8217;t have it both ways&#8230;if you want to retain your tax-exempt status, then you need to keep your pulpit free of political rhetoric. I believe a pastor can, as an INDIVIDUAL,  involve him/herself in election activities, BUT, the minute that involvement spills over to the pulpit, all bets are off. When you start spouting political rhetoric from the pulpit, you are violating the agreement by which your church received its tax-exemption. When you violate the agreement, the contract is terminated, and you can start negotiations with the IRS for filing your yearly claim form.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8380</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8380</guid>
					<description>Sandspur,
Amen brother.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sandspur,<br />
Amen brother.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: Sandspur</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8369</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 12:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8369</guid>
					<description>We got all our teeth Dale. Peanuts are boiled in salty water to penetrate the shell and make them yum yum good!
I think the general absense of teeth is more indigenous to YOUR area. 
However, I would gladly cover you or any of your pals on the battlefield......just not this battlefield!
Let's remember not to take these exchanges for granted. Some governments would never allow it's constituents to voice conflicting viewpoints....conflicting with theirs, that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>We got all our teeth Dale. Peanuts are boiled in salty water to penetrate the shell and make them yum yum good!<br />
I think the general absense of teeth is more indigenous to YOUR area.<br />
However, I would gladly cover you or any of your pals on the battlefield&#8230;&#8230;just not this battlefield!<br />
Let&#8217;s remember not to take these exchanges for granted. Some governments would never allow it&#8217;s constituents to voice conflicting viewpoints&#8230;.conflicting with theirs, that is.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8327</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 23:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8327</guid>
					<description>Splinter,
You can call yourself anything you want.  Stephanie and me and Alex, and McGinn and John E. and Rick and the others will smoke you out and chase you like a scalded dog.
There is no possibility that you can hide, as there is no possibility that I can do so.
We know you by your rhetorical views.
You do have a brick wall that you will hit at every turn.  And that is the wall of reason.
You either jump on the train, or sit on the tracks.  
I do, however, support your decision to continue to try to make your case, even in this environment of rationality.
It's kinda funny,  and you do serve a purpose as an example to others who would be too shy to actually air their ive views here.  You do that in a most humble and honest manner.  I do appreciate your attitude.  After all, the only disability in life is a bad attitude. 
You do remain a sandspur in my sock.  But, someone has to keep me honest. Why not you?
By the way, I was asking one of my cronies why you guys would put the salted peanuts in your RC cola and he responded immediately that it is the same reason that you all boill your peanuts;  most of you do not have any teeth so you have to soften them up in order to be able to masticate and swallow them.  Is there any truth to that?
If it would come down to you and me on a battlefield, in mortal combat, I am convinced that we would cover each other to the utmost extent.
With all Due Respect,
dale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Splinter,<br />
You can call yourself anything you want.  Stephanie and me and Alex, and McGinn and John E. and Rick and the others will smoke you out and chase you like a scalded dog.<br />
There is no possibility that you can hide, as there is no possibility that I can do so.<br />
We know you by your rhetorical views.<br />
You do have a brick wall that you will hit at every turn.  And that is the wall of reason.<br />
You either jump on the train, or sit on the tracks.<br />
I do, however, support your decision to continue to try to make your case, even in this environment of rationality.<br />
It&#8217;s kinda funny,  and you do serve a purpose as an example to others who would be too shy to actually air their ive views here.  You do that in a most humble and honest manner.  I do appreciate your attitude.  After all, the only disability in life is a bad attitude.<br />
You do remain a sandspur in my sock.  But, someone has to keep me honest. Why not you?<br />
By the way, I was asking one of my cronies why you guys would put the salted peanuts in your RC cola and he responded immediately that it is the same reason that you all boill your peanuts;  most of you do not have any teeth so you have to soften them up in order to be able to masticate and swallow them.  Is there any truth to that?<br />
If it would come down to you and me on a battlefield, in mortal combat, I am convinced that we would cover each other to the utmost extent.<br />
With all Due Respect,<br />
dale.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: Mr. IUSFP</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8313</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8313</guid>
					<description>Oh...I see now, you two are gonna team up on me.
I may start using &quot;Mr. Anonymous&quot;. Then you won't know who I am!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh&#8230;I see now, you two are gonna team up on me.<br />
I may start using &#8220;Mr. Anonymous&#8221;. Then you won&#8217;t know who I am!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8312</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8312</guid>
					<description>!!!! Me too Steph!!!!!

Illogical user of stupid facts person- I cant forget.  I think I was a bit more cantankerous than usual that day!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>!!!! Me too Steph!!!!!</p>
	<p>Illogical user of stupid facts person- I cant forget.  I think I was a bit more cantankerous than usual that day!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: Stephanie</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8307</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8307</guid>
					<description>Personally, I liked Shitbird best...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Personally, I liked Shitbird best&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: Mr. IUSFP</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8305</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8305</guid>
					<description>That's good Dale, I already forgot what IUSFP stood for!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>That&#8217;s good Dale, I already forgot what IUSFP stood for!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8304</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8304</guid>
					<description>I hereby name you, appropriately &quot;splinter.&quot;  I like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I hereby name you, appropriately &#8220;splinter.&#8221;  I like it!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8303</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8303</guid>
					<description>Sure I do do.  I just happen to remember from a botany class I took about 33 years ago that a sadspur or sandbur is any of several grasses of the genus Cenchrus, especially C. tribuloides, of the eastern United States and tropical America, having a spiny burlike envelope that surrounds several one-grained spikelets.  I remember it distinctly.

I would prefer to charaterize it- As I slide down the banister of life you are a splinter in my ass.

I can't argue with you about the cicil rights matter, but I consider that a noble cause.
I consider what Dobson wants to accomplish as an ignoble cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Sure I do do.  I just happen to remember from a botany class I took about 33 years ago that a sadspur or sandbur is any of several grasses of the genus Cenchrus, especially C. tribuloides, of the eastern United States and tropical America, having a spiny burlike envelope that surrounds several one-grained spikelets.  I remember it distinctly.</p>
	<p>I would prefer to charaterize it- As I slide down the banister of life you are a splinter in my ass.</p>
	<p>I can&#8217;t argue with you about the cicil rights matter, but I consider that a noble cause.<br />
I consider what Dobson wants to accomplish as an ignoble cause.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: Mr. IUSFP</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8299</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:10:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8299</guid>
					<description>Dale!
How come I get an &quot;F'? According to this blog, he's doing nothing different than other special interest groups as long as no one is endorsed. Civil rights groups used the church to great effect during the &quot;60's for voter participation!
I don't follow Dobson, Robertson or any of those other characters, I just like to be a sandspur in your sock! You do know what a sandspur is, right? I run into them a lot while sitting around the gas station having my moon pie and RC and cogitating whether we landed on the moon or not. (I think we did, the weather has not been the same since)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dale!<br />
How come I get an &#8220;F&#8217;? According to this blog, he&#8217;s doing nothing different than other special interest groups as long as no one is endorsed. Civil rights groups used the church to great effect during the &#8220;60&#8217;s for voter participation!<br />
I don&#8217;t follow Dobson, Robertson or any of those other characters, I just like to be a sandspur in your sock! You do know what a sandspur is, right? I run into them a lot while sitting around the gas station having my moon pie and RC and cogitating whether we landed on the moon or not. (I think we did, the weather has not been the same since)!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: dale</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8286</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 14:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8286</guid>
					<description>Very good, John.  You get an A+ for your insight.
Moonie and Mark shall recieve F- or, better yet, an Incomplete.
It is apparent that humanism should be taught in the public schools and it is way overdue.
It is completely constitutional as it depends completely on history, psycology, and anthropology to show the value of being moral and ethical.  It is the voice of reason.
It is my new rule (if I may, indeed, be so ostentatious) that if someone quotes the bible, they also must present a societal, psycological and/ or anthropological/ historical value system to support the biblical tenet.  Then we can start making some progress.
You would find a lot more kids would respond to this type of moral/ ethical training rather trying to get them to believe all this guy-in-the-sky stuff.  
Example-  You cannot and should not be able to say in a public school that it is wrong to abuse children because Jesus said so.  Nobody cares what Jesus said because he does not show any value in behaving the way he is saying to behave.  But if you show the value system at work here, it has been shown to be highly effective at producing far more acceptable behaviour patterns than trying to scare the shit out of a kid by threatening them with eternal hell and damnation.  Very simply (and this is oversimplified) one does not want to abuse kids because it is detrimental to society.  It becomes a generational perversion.

For those of you in the remedial class, I shall digress to a simple definition.
Humanism is a category of active ethical philosophies that affirm the dignity and worth of all people, based on the ability to determine right and wrong by appeal to universal human qualities—particularly rationalism. Humanism is a component of a variety of more specific philosophical systems, and is also incorporated into some religious schools of thought.
Humanism entails a commitment to the search for truth and morality through human means in support of human interests. In focusing on the capacity for self-determination, humanism rejects transcendental justifications, such as a dependence on faith, the supernatural, or divinely revealed texts. Humanists endorse universal morality based on the commonality of human nature.
For the edification of those that need it, there is also a branch referred to as Religious Humanism that is kinda, sorta, acceptable to this writer.
Humanism features an optimistic attitude about the capacity of people, but it does not involve believing that human nature is purely good or that each and every person is capable of living up to the humanist ideals of rationality and morality. If anything, there is the recognition that living up to our potential is hard work and requires the help of others. The ultimate goal is human flourishing; making life better for all of us. Even among humanists who do believe in some sort of an afterlife, the focus is on doing good and living well in the here and now, and leaving the world better for those who come after us, not on suffering through life to be rewarded afterwards.
Humanism was &quot;invented&quot; by the most early Homo Sapiens and beyond that (another discussion.)
Pagans were pure humanists and used their array of gods as intermediaries to ask for rain, fetility, etc.  
Only later did egos evolve to the point where religion was used as an element of power and control as it is still used today.
It is very interesting to study isolated civilizations practicing their indigenous &quot;religion.&quot;
Most of these are very kind and benevolent to children and the elderly.  Some of their welfare systems could be a great model for our own.
As John McGinn so eloquently pointed out above, like it or not, modern christianity grew out of humanisim, but in a superstitious way that describes the world view of the originators of that system.
We must begin to teach our kids about rational value systems or we will end up victims of the Reconstuctionists as outlined by Clark in his post of this morning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Very good, John.  You get an A+ for your insight.<br />
Moonie and Mark shall recieve F- or, better yet, an Incomplete.<br />
It is apparent that humanism should be taught in the public schools and it is way overdue.<br />
It is completely constitutional as it depends completely on history, psycology, and anthropology to show the value of being moral and ethical.  It is the voice of reason.<br />
It is my new rule (if I may, indeed, be so ostentatious) that if someone quotes the bible, they also must present a societal, psycological and/ or anthropological/ historical value system to support the biblical tenet.  Then we can start making some progress.<br />
You would find a lot more kids would respond to this type of moral/ ethical training rather trying to get them to believe all this guy-in-the-sky stuff.<br />
Example-  You cannot and should not be able to say in a public school that it is wrong to abuse children because Jesus said so.  Nobody cares what Jesus said because he does not show any value in behaving the way he is saying to behave.  But if you show the value system at work here, it has been shown to be highly effective at producing far more acceptable behaviour patterns than trying to scare the shit out of a kid by threatening them with eternal hell and damnation.  Very simply (and this is oversimplified) one does not want to abuse kids because it is detrimental to society.  It becomes a generational perversion.</p>
	<p>For those of you in the remedial class, I shall digress to a simple definition.<br />
Humanism is a category of active ethical philosophies that affirm the dignity and worth of all people, based on the ability to determine right and wrong by appeal to universal human qualities—particularly rationalism. Humanism is a component of a variety of more specific philosophical systems, and is also incorporated into some religious schools of thought.<br />
Humanism entails a commitment to the search for truth and morality through human means in support of human interests. In focusing on the capacity for self-determination, humanism rejects transcendental justifications, such as a dependence on faith, the supernatural, or divinely revealed texts. Humanists endorse universal morality based on the commonality of human nature.<br />
For the edification of those that need it, there is also a branch referred to as Religious Humanism that is kinda, sorta, acceptable to this writer.<br />
Humanism features an optimistic attitude about the capacity of people, but it does not involve believing that human nature is purely good or that each and every person is capable of living up to the humanist ideals of rationality and morality. If anything, there is the recognition that living up to our potential is hard work and requires the help of others. The ultimate goal is human flourishing; making life better for all of us. Even among humanists who do believe in some sort of an afterlife, the focus is on doing good and living well in the here and now, and leaving the world better for those who come after us, not on suffering through life to be rewarded afterwards.<br />
Humanism was &#8220;invented&#8221; by the most early Homo Sapiens and beyond that (another discussion.)<br />
Pagans were pure humanists and used their array of gods as intermediaries to ask for rain, fetility, etc.<br />
Only later did egos evolve to the point where religion was used as an element of power and control as it is still used today.<br />
It is very interesting to study isolated civilizations practicing their indigenous &#8220;religion.&#8221;<br />
Most of these are very kind and benevolent to children and the elderly.  Some of their welfare systems could be a great model for our own.<br />
As John McGinn so eloquently pointed out above, like it or not, modern christianity grew out of humanisim, but in a superstitious way that describes the world view of the originators of that system.<br />
We must begin to teach our kids about rational value systems or we will end up victims of the Reconstuctionists as outlined by Clark in his post of this morning.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Dobson Takes Electoral Organizing To the Churches &#8212; This Time Publicly by: Brent</title>
		<link>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8281</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://defconblog.org/2006/08/dobson-takes-electoral-organizing-to-the-churches-this-time-publicly/#comment-8281</guid>
					<description>Dobson, a.k.a 'Dogma'son is Der Fuehrer of the American Taliban Tax the defaecation out of Focus on you own damn Family. Take away 'Dogma'son's tax exempt status. He is THE MOST DANGEROUS man in America. 'Dogma'son is America's Osama bin Laden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Dobson, a.k.a &#8216;Dogma&#8217;son is Der Fuehrer of the American Taliban Tax the defaecation out of Focus on you own damn Family. Take away &#8216;Dogma&#8217;son&#8217;s tax exempt status. He is THE MOST DANGEROUS man in America. &#8216;Dogma&#8217;son is America&#8217;s Osama bin Laden.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
